Darren Snow in Pro Bono success at the NMC

Darren Snow recently represented a nurse before the Nursing & Midwifery Council in fitness to practice proceedings concerning potentially career ending allegations of patient abuse, dishonesty and multiple clinical failures at a care home involving several patients, one of whom had died and been the subject of neglect allegations by the family. Darren acted pro bono, instructed by Advocate. The allegations went back several years and until Darren’s involvement the nurse had been a litigant in person with no legal advice or support at all.  The nurse had continued to work with new employers in the interim without any interim order in place. Darren was able to get a substantial amount of highly prejudicial material excluded from the hearing including evidence from an inquest and police investigation – all accepted by the NMC to be inadmissible despite their initial attempts to rely upon it in the proceedings. At the hearing Darren’s submissions led to all charges of patient abuse and dishonesty being dismissed. Limited findings on separate charges were made by the Panel in respect of clinical failures leading to a 1-year caution order being imposed. In feedback to Advocate the nurse said of Darren “I would particularly like to thank Darren Snow, without his legal knowledge I would not have got through it” Darren Snow is ranked in the Legal 500 as a leading junior in professional discipline work. He has a wealth of experience successfully defending nurses and midwives at the NMC and regularly acts for the RCN and other defence organisations. For further information on Libertas’s Professional Disciplinary and Pro Bono work please contact our clerks.

Ongwen Appeal at the International Criminal Court

The decision in the Dominic Ongwen Appeal was handed down on Thursday 15 December 2022. All of his grounds of appeal were dismissed. However, one judge recognised the importance of the non-punishment principle for former child soldiers from the Amici brief observations submitted by Dr Felicity Gerry KC who attended the appeal hearing and led a group of practitioners and academics in submitting the brief. In paragraph 107 of the Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza referred to the observations of Gerry et al as follows: 107. Gerry et al., drawing upon their expertise in modern slavery law and criminal responsibility, submitted that “‘non-punishment’ of victims of modern slavery/human trafficking includes the non-liability of former child soldiers who commit crimes when they continue to suffer the effects of their victimhood through compromised mental health”.They noted that the Trial Chamber “did not consider or express any legal principles for evaluating the effect of being a child soldier nor the mental health nexus” in the trial or sentencing phases.They discussed “the need to recognise the long-term effects of being a child soldier”.They stressed the importance of applying relevant legal principles to the question of Mr Ongwen’s criminal responsibility in light of the fact that he was “made into a child soldier by the means and purposes of others” and that he “suffered as a consequence”. Non punishment of victims of human trafficking / modern slavery is an emerging norm in criminal law and remains an important issue for prosecutors to consider when seeking to prosecute former child soldiers and other victim perpetrators. You can read the Amici observation here https://www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-02/04-01/15-1929 You can read about the Ongwen appeal here https://www.icc-cpi.int/cases?f%5B0%5D=state_of_%3A132